Differ about canvas the exploration of the style, before more than 10 years, once had appeared to heat up the controversy of intense and bold practice. Put forward afresh again now, and the requirement is more pressing. This is a thing that how makes a person happy! 10 years the art of confine, asphyxial, become rigid lives, con taught us: Besides content, also must notice art behaves force. People detests the sort of hypocritical content, also cannot bear the sort of apery to reflect the form that resemble, style. Content is concoctive, ask again " distinct " . Without feeling, did not live, did not draw the condition of model again. Be forced to borrowed pictorial, copy photograph, do affectedly, machine-made. Artistically forces at the person, all people are forced must " appreciation " , " love " a kind of genre, want to cause huge allergy and confrontation of course.
Object be being illuminated affectedly like creed, not be popularly objects realistically gimmick of style, expression. Otherwise, can be on another extreme again. But still basically cast off the fetter, problem that breaks through forbidden zone currently. Content (subject matter) the forbidden zone nature that go up is communications center is broken, the forbidden zone on formal color is indifferent to? What is more,the rather that this problem appears more complex much. Let a hundred flowers blossom, it is easy to say to return, start work really it is much more difficult to do. This does not do not have a reason, formally " frank " still can exhibit, publish, having change a bit is very easy be being said is " formalism " , " estheticism " , and " formalism " be treason and heresy, be next to almost reactionary. Painters should take care naturally, or " frank " a bit insurance, "Frank " namely realistically meaning, is realistically " realistic " . Is this kind of idea after all from where come?
Involve canvas issue so, two kinds of popular all the time views: "The characteristic of canvas is sense of reality! " , "Brushwork of western modernist school is decayed completely, degenerate formalism, be without desirable place! " this is a distinction it seems that realistic with formalism do not become the code of article, standard. This is a forbidden zone, also be an academic problem, more by " 4 people are helped " a problem of leave no room for manoeuvre. Although long-term vexed, never solve, but should not adopt only prohibit, despotic guiding principle, in learned allow a debate, allow mutual and critically, be practical and realistic, admit the objective existence of the thing, if it were not for opposes a party, turn over socialism, artistically is beautiful, not be ugly, why to allow to exist? Can be helpful for artistic development only so.
Main now the adornment style from canvas (or adornment sex) this angle raises a few questions. Talk about the contemporary to the west traditional Chinese clothes that draw a clique to act the role of the view that the style develops from practice respect only, and can get from inside their history what is drawn lessons from with the lesson, the decorates wind canvas development that will explore us and nation turn an issue.
Previous12 3 Next